News articles tagged 'Court'

TICK TOCK for Tea Too Similar to TIC TAC for Confectionery

A Hearings Officer recently upheld the opposition by Ferrero to registration of TICK TOCK in class 30 for tea. Read More

Hearings Officer’s Views to be Given Weight by Appellate Courts

The Court of Appeal has overturned the High Court’s ruling that WILD GEESE is confusingly similar to WILD TURKEY in respect of class 33 goods. Read More

Is it “Use” of a Trade Mark if it is Not Used on the Goods?

In Aqua Technics Pool and Spa Centre New Zealand Limited v Aqua-Tech Limited (unreported, CA257/05, 22 March 2007, Court of Appeal) the Court of Appeal was asked to consider whether the respondent, Aqua-Tech Limited (Aqua-Tech), had established use... Read More

Figurative mark trampled by Red Bull

Red Bull successfully opposed the application of a mark for a horned bovine skull on a predominantly red background made by Carabao Tawandang Co Limited In Carabao Tawandang Company Limited v Red Bull GmbH (CIV-20065-485-1975, August 31 2006),... Read More

Off the starting block

Case commentary on New Zealand's Supreme Court first patent case, as it reaches its conclusion. To read article click here. You will require Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this file. Read More

MAX mark screened from IMAX opposition

IMAX and Village Roadshow MAX trade marks not similar IMAX is a Canadian Corporation specialising in large screen and large format, motion simulator entertainment. Read More

Plant Variety Rights

Commentary on the first case to consider infringement of plant variety rights in New Zealand. Read More

Appellant Wins Battle Only to Lose the War

First trade mark case determined by recently established Supreme Court. Read More

Submarine Patents

The problem with submarine patents is that they have been used to generate royalty incomes, by people who have been able to predict developments in a technology, rather than to protect their own developments. Read More