News

Keep up-to-date with the latest intellectual property news:

01 May 2008

One click lands book vendor in cart

There is an ongoing debate around the world on whether software or business-method patents should be patentable in the US and other countries. Amazon’s controversial “one click” technology could soon be patented in New Zealand. The Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (IPONZ) has recently accepted a New Zealand patent application made by Amazon.com Inc... Read more

01 May 2008

Comparative advertising

The Trade Marks Act 2002 changes the legal approach to comparative advertising. The Trade Marks Act 1953 Under the Trade Marks Act 1953 comparative advertising is conduct that is likely to infringe a registered trade mark. There is a specific defence however, where the trade mark for registered in Part B of the register. This defence applies to the exceptions listed in section 8 (... Read more

01 May 2008

Fresh exemption for patent infringement in New Zealand

The enactment of an amendment to the New Zealand Patents Act 1953 in December 2002 has the potential to reduce the effective life of pharmaceutical patents. In a surprise move just prior to Christmas 2002, an amendment to the New Zealand Patents Act 1953 was enacted. The amendment has important implications for owners of patent rights operating in industry sectors where marketing approval is... Read more

30 Apr 2008

Design law change cuts costs for exporters with designs on Europe

Important changes to design law in Europe means exporters of innovative products have greater access to a powerful weapon in the intellectual property arsenal. Exporters must often deal with the problem of cheap copycat products. One option for preventing rip-offs is to register a design for products where visual appearance is an important factor. Until now, the cost of covering... Read more

24 Apr 2008

Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health

Possible acceptance of TRIPS Amendment by New Zealand The purpose of this consultation document is to obtain the views of the public on whether New Zealand should accept a Protocol amending the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (“the TRIPS Agreement”). The Doha Declaration deals with the granting of compulsory licenses... Read more

24 Apr 2008

Guide to Intellectual Property for Maori Organisations and Communities

The New Zealand government has released a free Guide to Intellectual Property for Maori Organisations and Communities. The guide is part of the first phase of a three-step work programme to examine more closely the relationship between IP rights and systems and traditional knowledge. One of the aims of the first stage is to “build the capacity of the... Read more

24 Apr 2008

Baldwins ranked top tier NZ patent firm

Managing Intellectual Property “World IP Survey 2008” results have been released. Baldwins has again participated in Managing IP’s survey of leading firms in 65 jurisdictions.  The results rank firms by country indicating their capabilities in prosecution and contentious work for both patents and trade marks. Baldwins maintains its position from last year, ranked at the top -... Read more

24 Apr 2008

The Death Knell

Could local novelty be on the way out in New Zealand? Case commentary on  two recent decisions from the Assistant Commissioner of Patents. To downlaod the article in PDF format: The Death Knell You will require Adobe Acrobat Reader to view this file. Read more

24 Apr 2008

MAX mark screened from IMAX opposition

IMAX and Village Roadshow MAX trade marks not similar. IMAX is a Canadian Corporation specialising in large screen and large format, motion simulator entertainment. IMAX opened one of its theatres in a prominent position on one of the main streets of Auckland, New Zealand in July 1999. That theatre closed in April 2002 and the trade mark IMAX has not been used... Read more

24 Apr 2008

Intellectual Property in New Zealand and Australia

With increasing globalisation and the impact of FTAs, an IP strategy that fails to include New Zealand and Australia creates a serious gap which can be exploited by competitors.   New Zealand and Australia have traditionally been countries which have not featured prominently in the intellectual property strategies of intellectual property owners. This has been to the benefit of... Read more